Empirical Factors Affecting the Quality of Non-Negative Matrix Factorization of Mammalian Cell Raman Spectra

Author:

Georg Schulze H.1,Konorov Stanislav O.12,Piret James M.13,Blades Michael W.2,Turner Robin F. B.124

Affiliation:

1. Michael Smith Laboratories, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

2. Department of Chemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

3. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Abstract

Mammalian cells contain various macromolecules that can be investigated non-invasively with Raman spectroscopy. The particular mixture of major macromolecules present in a cell being probed are reflected in the measured Raman spectra. Determining macromolecular identities and estimating their concentrations from these mixture Raman spectra can distinguish cell types and otherwise enable biological research. However, the application of canonical multivariate methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA), to perform spectral unmixing yields mathematical solutions that can be difficult to interpret. Non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) improves the interpretability of unmixed macromolecular components, but can be difficult to apply because ambiguities produced by overlapping Raman bands permit multiple solutions. Furthermore, theoretically sound methods can be difficult to implement in practice. Here we examined the effects of a number of empirical approaches on the quality of NNMF results. These approaches were evaluated on simulated mammalian cell Raman hyperspectra and the results were used to develop an enhanced procedure for implementing NNMF. We demonstrated the utility of this procedure using a Raman hyperspectral data set measured from human islet cells to recover the spectra of insulin and glucagon. This was compared to the relatively inferior PCA of these data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Spectroscopy,Instrumentation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3