Comparison of plasma total carbon dioxide and standard hydrogen carbonate in a hospital laboratory setting

Author:

Hansen Rasmus Søgaard1ORCID,Revsholm Jesper1,Sandberg Maria B1,Jørgensen Louise H1,Nybo Mads1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark

Abstract

Background Studies comparing venous total carbon dioxide (tCO2) and standard hydrogen carbonate (HCO3(P,st)) has shown diverse results, and it is debatable whether these two parameters can be used interchangeably for workup of acid–base disorders in a hospital setting. Method All patients with an HCO3(P,st) requisition from any department at Odense University Hospital between 11th May 2021 and 1st June 2021 had tCO2 and HCO3(P,st) analysed simultaneously. TCO2 was measured on Cobas® 8000, c702 module, while HCO3(P,st) was calculated based on measurements on ABL835 Flex. Results From 1210 patients, mean (standard deviation (SD)) was 22.9 (3.7) mmol/L for tCO2 and 22.5 (2.9) mmol/L for HCO3(P,st). TCO2 range was 10.1–42.3 mmol/L and 11.7–41.4 mmol/L for HCO3(P,st). Linear regression showed that tCO2 (mmol/L) = −2.90 + 1.15 × HCO3(P,st) (mmol/L) with R2 = 0.81. Bias (mean (SD) difference) between tCO2 and HCO3(P,st)) was 0.4 (1.7) mmol/L with a −5.0–9.6 mmol/L range. Limits of agreement was −2.90–3.70 mmol/L. Comparison of classification within, above or below reference interval for tCO2 and HCO3(P,st) showed that 984 samples (81%) retained their classification. Only one sample (0.1%) would be severely misclassified (outside the respective reference intervals) if HCO3(P,st) was considered the gold standard. Of the samples investigated, 46.1% had a mean difference between tCO2 and HCO3(P,st) of 0–1 mmol/L and 30.3% had 1.1–2.0 mmol/L. Conclusions Our results indicate that venous tCO2 and venous HCO3(P,st) can be used interchangeably in a hospital setting for workup of acid–base disorders.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3