Multiple Sclerosis International Federation guideline methodology for off-label treatments for multiple sclerosis

Author:

Piggott Thomas1ORCID,Nonino Francesco23,Baldin Elisa2,Filippini Graziella4,Rijke Nick5,Schünemann Holger16,Laurson-Doube Joanna5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

2. Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Review Group, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

3. The WHO Collaborating Centre in Evidence-Based Research Synthesis and Guideline Development Direzione Generale Cura della Persona Salute e Welfare, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy

4. Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Review Group, Scientific Director‘s Office, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy

5. Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, London, UK

6. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background A total of 2.8 million people are living with multiple sclerosis and due to disparities in access to medicines, the ability to treat this condition varies widely. Off-label disease-modifying therapies are sometimes more available or affordable in different health systems. Appropriate methodology is integral in creating high-quality and trustworthy guidelines. In this article, we outline Multiple Sclerosis International Federation’s (MSIF) approach to creating guidelines for off-label treatments for multiple sclerosis. Methods We use the Guidelines International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework. We developed detailed health descriptors for health outcomes and the panel drafted PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions and prioritised outcomes. We collaborate with independent organisations, which systematically review and collate the information. We are actively engaging stakeholders and consulting with relevant organisations, boards, working groups and individuals. Results The draft guideline recommendations will be published for open comment and stakeholders will be encouraged to endorse and disseminate the guidelines. Our methodology ensures integrity and transparency in the criteria, evidence and judgement used to make recommendations. Conclusions This approach will facilitate transparent creation of high-quality and trustworthy guidelines, and allow the global guidelines to be adopted or adapted into national settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3