An Investigation of IEP Quality Associated With Special Education Placement for Students With Complex Support Needs

Author:

Kurth Jennifer A.1ORCID,Lockman Turner Elissa1ORCID,Gerasimova Daria1,Hicks Tyler A.1,Zagona Alison1ORCID,Lansey Kirsten2,Mansouri Mary Curran1ORCID,Lyon Kristin J.1,Jameson Matt2ORCID,Loyless Roxanne1,Pace Jesse R.1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA

2. The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA

Abstract

Students with complex support needs require individualized education programs (IEPs) to describe their present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP), and the annual goals and supplementary aids and services (SAS) that will be provided to enable them to make progress in the least restrictive environment. Previous research has found that IEPs do not reflect recommended practices and that IEP quality varies by educational placement in inclusive and separate class settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a national sample of IEPs of elementary-aged students with complex support needs to determine whether placement predicts IEP quality. We used multilevel regression to measure the extent to which placement predicts overall IEP quality as well as the quality of IEP components, including PLAAFP, goals, and SAS. We did not detect statistically significant differences in IEP quality by placement for any of these IEP components or for overall quality; instead, we found the IEPs consistently failed to meet quality indicators across all four placement types. Given these findings, we suggest implications for future research aimed at improving IEP quality for students with complex support needs.

Funder

Institute of Education Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Health Professions,Social Psychology

Reference37 articles.

1. Fissuring Barriers to Inclusive Education for Students with Severe Disabilities

2. Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District RE - 1. (2017). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/580/15-827/

3. Outcomes of Inclusive Versus Separate Placements: A Matched Pairs Comparison Study

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3