Principles for delivering improved care of people with functional seizures: Closing the treatment gap

Author:

Winton-Brown Toby12ORCID,Wilson Sarah J34,Felmingham Kim3,Rayner Genevieve13,O’Brien Terence J1,O’Brien Patrick5,Mohan Adith67,Velakoulis Dennis89,Kanaan Richard910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

2. Alfred Mental and Addiction Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

4. Department of Clinical Neuropsychology and Department of Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

5. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia

6. Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia

7. Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia

8. Neuropsychiatry, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

9. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

10. Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures have similar or greater levels of disability, morbidity and mortality than people with epilepsy, but there are far fewer treatment services. In contrast to epilepsy, the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and the development of evidence-based treatments for functional seizures is rudimentary. This leads to high direct healthcare costs and high indirect costs to the patient, family and wider society. There are many patient, clinician and system-level barriers to improving outcomes for functional seizures. At a patient level, these include the heterogeneity of symptoms, diagnostic uncertainty, family factors and difficulty in perceiving psychological aspects of illness and potential benefits of treatment. Clinician-level barriers include sub-specialism, poor knowledge, skills and attitudes and stigma. System-level barriers include the siloed nature of healthcare, the high prevalence of functional seizures and funding models relying on individual medical practitioners. Through the examination of international examples and expert recommendations, several themes emerge that may address some of these barriers. These include (1) stepped care with low-level, brief generalised interventions, proceeding to higher level, extended and individualised treatments; (2) active triage of complexity, acuity and treatment readiness; (3) integrated interdisciplinary teams that individualise formulation, triage, and treatment planning and (4) shared care with primary, emergency and community providers and secondary consultation. Consideration of the application of these principles to the Australian and New Zealand context is proposed as a significant opportunity to meet an urgent need.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3