Mental health–related service and medicine use among a cohort of urban Aboriginal children and young people: Data linkage study

Author:

Young Christian1ORCID,Burgess Leonie1,Falster Kathleen2,Zoega Helga23,Banks Emily4,Clapham Kathleen5,Woolfenden Sue67,Cutmore Mandy1,Williamson Anna1

Affiliation:

1. The Sax Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

3. Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

4. College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

5. Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia

6. Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to describe mental health service and psychotropic medicine use among a cohort of Aboriginal young people and quantify their relation to sociodemographic, family and health factors. Methods: In a prospective cohort study with data linkage, 892 Aboriginal children aged 0–17 years living in urban and regional areas of New South Wales, Australia, were included. We assessed mental health–related service use, paediatric service use and psychotropic medicine dispensing claims covered by the Australian Government Medicare Benefits Schedule and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme from July 2012 to June 2017. Results: Most children (71%) did not have a record of mental health service or psychotropic medication use. 18.7% had ⩾1 mental health–related service claim; 26.7% had ⩾1 paediatric service claim; and 20.3% had ⩾1 psychotropic medicine dispensing claim. General practitioner services were the most accessed mental health–related service (17.4%) and 12.7% had been dispensed attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medicines. Child characteristics associated with treatment included emotional and behavioural problems (prevalence ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval = [1.46, 2.64] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.87, 95% confidence interval = [2.07, 3.96] for medicines) and risky behaviour (prevalence ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.12, 2.16] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.28, 95% confidence interval = [1.54, 3.37] for medicines). Parent-related factors included chronic illness (prevalence ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval = [1.03, 1.95] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 2.00, 95% confidence interval = [1.49, 2.69] for medicines) and functional limitations (prevalence ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval = [1.16, 2.24] for mental health services; prevalence ratio: 1.86, 95% confidence interval = [1.34, 2.59] for medicines). Conclusions: Most Aboriginal children and young people did not have claims for mental health services or medicines. Aboriginal children with emotional and behavioural problems, or parents with health problems were more likely to have mental health service or medicine claims.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference44 articles.

1. Close the Gap: Aboriginal community controlled health services

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Intentional self-harm in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/articles/intentional-self-harm-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-people (accessed June 2020).

3. Australian Government (n.d.a) MBS Online. Available at: www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Home (accessed June 2019).

4. Australian Government (n.d.b) Mental health services in Australia. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/mental-health/overview/australias-mental-health-services (accessed March 2020).

5. Australian Government (n.d.c) The pharmaceutical benefits scheme. Available at: www.pbs.gov.au/pbs/home (accessed June 2019).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3