Awareness of illness moderates self-assessment of psychotic symptoms

Author:

Martinez Agulleiro Luis12ORCID,de Filippis Renato13,Rosson Stella145,Patil Bhagyashree1,Prizgint Lara1,Talasazan Nahal1,Meltzer Herbert Y6,Kane John M178,Gibbons Robert D9,Guinart Daniel17810ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

2. Psychiatry Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Spain

3. Psychiatric Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

4. Psychiatric Unit, Department of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, Venice, Italy

5. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy

6. Department of Psychiatry, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

7. Institute for Behavioral Health, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA

8. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Manhasset, NY, USA

9. Center for Health Statistics and Departments of Medicine, Public Health Sciences (Biostatistics), Psychiatry, Comparative Human Development, and the Committee on Quantitative Methods, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

10. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiccions (INAD), Hospital del Mar, Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Departament de Psiquiatria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Objective: Self-reports or patient-reported outcome measures are seldom used in psychosis due to concerns about the ability of patients to accurately report their symptomatology, particularly in cases of low awareness of illness. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of insight on the accuracy of self-reported psychotic symptoms using a computerized adaptive testing tool (CAT-Psychosis). Methods: A secondary analysis of data drawn from the CAT-Psychosis development and validation study was performed. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorders were administered by clinicians. Patients completed the self-reported version of the CAT-Psychosis. Patients were median-split regarding their insight level to compare the correlation between the two psychosis severity measures. A subgroup sensitivity analysis was performed only on patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Results: A total of 159 patients with a psychotic disorder who completed both CAT-Psychosis and Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorders were included. For the whole sample, CAT-Psychosis scores showed convergent validity with Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ratings ( r = 0.517, 95% confidence interval = [0.392, 0.622], p < 0.001). Insight was found to moderate this correlation (β = –0.511, p = 0.005), yet agreement between both measures remained statistically significant for both high ( r = 0.621, 95% confidence interval = [0.476, 0.733], p < 0.001) and low insight patients ( r = 0.408, 95% confidence interval = [0.187, 0.589], p < 0.001), while psychosis severity was comparable between these groups (for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: U = 3057, z = –0.129, p = 0.897; disorganization: U = 2986.5, z = –0.274, p = 0.784 and for CAT-Psychosis: U = 2800.5, z = –1.022, p = 0.307). Subgroup of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders showed very similar results. Conclusions: Insight moderates the correlation between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of psychosis, yet CAT-Psychosis remains valid in patients with both high and low awareness of illness.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3