Use of psychotropic medications in adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Song Menghuan1ORCID,Rubin Bryn S2,Ha Justin WT3,Ware Robert S14,Doan Tan N5,Harley David6

Affiliation:

1. Queensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability (QCIDD), Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. Ochsner Clinical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia

4. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia

5. Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

6. Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Objective: This study presents the proportion of adults with intellectual disability using psychotropic medications including antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and psychostimulants. Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 31 December 2021. Articles were included if they reported the proportion of adults with intellectual disability using psychotropic medications. Frequency of use was estimated using a random effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the association between study-level characteristics and variability in estimates, when heterogeneity was considerable. Results: Twenty-four articles were included in pooled analysis. The pooled prevalence of psychotropic medications was 41% (95% confidence interval: 35–46%). Pooled prevalences of subclasses were as follows: antipsychotics 31% (27–35%), antidepressants 14% (9–19%), anxiolytics 9% (4–15%), hypnotics/sedatives 5% (2–8%), and psychostimulants 1% (1–2%). Heterogeneity was considerable between studies, except for psychostimulants. There was no significant association between assessed characteristics and variability in prevalence estimates. Conclusion: Two-fifths of adults with intellectual disability were prescribed psychotropic medications. Antipsychotics and antidepressants were used by one-third and one-seventh of adults, respectively. There was considerable variability between studies, and further investigation is required to determine the source of variability. More studies are needed to better characterise prescribed psychotropic medications, including effectiveness and adverse effects, to ensure appropriate use of these drugs.

Funder

University of Queensland Graduate School Scholarship

The Mater Foundation Frank Clair Scholarship

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3