Why Correctional Service Providers and Researchers Should Focus on Intersectionality and Recommendations to Get Started

Author:

Batastini Ashley B.1ORCID,Jones Ashley C. T.2ORCID,Patel Meera,Pringer Sarah M.1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Memphis

2. The University of Southern Mississippi

Abstract

Across disciplines, there has been increased attention to understanding and addressing compounded oppression and marginalization associated with intersecting identities. We argue that involvement with the criminal justice system can, in itself, represent an identity (self-ascribed or not) that interplays with other demographic and systemic variables, making it more difficult for these clients to disconnect from the system. We offer our perspective on integrating conversations and tools focused on intersectionality into assessment and interventions that address criminogenic risks, recommendations for adopting a mixed-methods approach to researching intersectionality in correctional settings that better accounts for individual variability, as well as suggestions for advocacy, policy reform, and graduate-level training. With its emphasis on diversity and multiculturalism, health service psychology and related professions are uniquely poised to help correctional agencies move in a more inclusive direction that will likely improve client well-being and prosocial reengagement as well as reduce continued systemic oppression.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,General Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference74 articles.

1. American Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.). Mass incarceration. https://www.aclu.org/issues/smart-justice/mass-incarceration

2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

3. Ash G. (2019, September 16). More money goes into the U.S. prison system than it does on education. Study International. https://www.studyinternational.com/news/education-spend-prison-system-us/

4. Bartholomew N. R., Morgan R. D., Mitchell S. M., Van Horn S. A. (2018). Criminal thinking, psychiatric symptoms, and recovery attitudes among community mental health patients: An examination of program placement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817734007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3