Justice Perceptions, Sexual Identity, and Race: Likelihood of Police Reporting Intentions Following Sexual Assault

Author:

Culatta Elizabeth1ORCID,Boyle Kaitlin M.ORCID,Shaiman Sophia2ORCID,Sutton Tara E.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Augusta University

2. University of South Carolina

3. Mississippi State University

Abstract

Perceptions of law enforcement shape a willingness to report crime and are particularly important for sex crimes and among groups oppressed or neglected by the legal system. We examine three types of perceptions of justice—the fairness of outcomes (distributive), procedures (procedural), and victim treatment (interpersonal). We expect each measure of justice perceptions to increase the likelihood of reporting, or recommending a friend report, a hypothetical sexual assault to police. Our survey of 18- to 24-year-old women ( N = 1,414) oversampled women of color and stratified the sample by educational attainment. In a series of path analyses, we find full support for our hypotheses about reporting one’s own sexual assault and partial support for encouraging a friend to report based on perceptions of three forms of justice. In addition, we examined indirect effects of sexual identity and race on reporting intentions and discuss how those patterns are partially driven by negative perceptions of justice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference87 articles.

1. Inequity In Social Exchange

2. To Tell or Not to Tell: The Impact of Disclosure on Sexual Assault Survivors’ Recovery

3. Ambrose M. L., Arnaud A. (2013). Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct? In Greenberg J., Colquitt J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 59–84). Psychology Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-03594-002

4. Beyond Convictions: Negotiating Procedural and Distributive Justice in Police Response to Sex Crimes Victims

5. Bies R. J., Moag J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki R. J., Sheppard B. H., Bazerman M. Z. (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573387450502494336

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3