Believing the blogs of war? How blog users compare on credibility and characteristics in 2003 and 2007

Author:

Johnson Thomas J.1,Kaye Barbara K.2

Affiliation:

1. School of Journalism, University of Texas at Austin, USA,

2. Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA,

Abstract

This study surveyed those who used blogs for information about the war in Iraq to investigate the degree to which judgements of credibility, reliance, demographics, and political characteristics of war blog users have changed between 2003 and 2007. In both 2003 and 2007, blog users judged blogs as more credible sources for war news than traditional media and their online counterparts. This study also found that different types of blogs were rated differently in terms of credibility in 2007 with military and war blogs rated the most credible and media blogs being judged the lowest in credibility. Additionally, parallels are drawn between the findings and possible roles for blogs in the escalating war in Afghanistan. Results are also discussed in terms of the changing roles of the military in Iraq as well as the changing role of blogs in the Iraq War.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication

Reference65 articles.

1. ABC News/Washington Post Poll (2009). URL (consulted 27 Feb. 2010): http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

2. The death of news

3. None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Has Blog Reader–Focused Research Evolved?;SAGE Open;2020-10

2. Breastfeeding, Authority, and Genre;Innovations in Global Maternal Health;2020

3. Confessions and Tweets: Social Media and Everyday Experience in the Israel Defense Forces;Armed Forces & Society;2019-07-16

4. [Un]breaking News;Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2018-04-21

5. Networked News, Racial Divides;COMMUN SOC POLIT;2017-11-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3