Affiliation:
1. Université Laval, Québec, Canada
Abstract
This article analyses the politics of seeing as a way to examine the elision of civilian casualty in the War on Terror. The author particularly focuses on the ambiguities and paradoxes at play in this discussion: the question of distance, the question of visibility and the role of the body. In doing so, she tells the story of how terrorism has emerged as a form of violence that centralizes bodies, focused on the figure of the innocent victim whose body has been destroyed by the body of another, even as the technology of drone strikes also operates by exploding bodies, but through the purported precision of techno-military operations. Such technology re-categorizes civilian death as collateral damage, defining these deaths as technological effects rather than as biological, embodied ones. This acts to disembody dead civilians even as increased attention is being given to soldier bodies (both dead and injured). In this sense, the author is not arguing that civilian death has become disembodied by virtue of the distancing caused by the drone apparatus. Rather, she seeks to tell a more complicated story of how the drone gaze functions as a perpetrator gaze, and who and what it sees.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication
Reference45 articles.
1. Aerial Life
2. Making the drone strange: the politics, aesthetics and surrealism of levitation
3. Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror
4. Imag(in)ing the severed head: ISIS beheadings and the absent spectacle
5. Barnes J (2009) Military refines a ‘constant stare against our enemy’. Los Angeles Times, 2 November. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov/02/nation/na-drone-eyes2 (accessed 14 October 2022).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献