Affiliation:
1. MIT’s Department of Physics,
2. University of Tokyo’s Research Center for Advanced Science and
Technology,
3. History Department at Central European University in Budapest,
Abstract
Historians and sociologists have highlighted the importance of skills, local practices and material culture in their studies of experimental sciences. This paper argues that the acquisition and transfer of skills in theoretical sciences should be understood in similar terms. Using the example of Feynman diagrams - first introduced by the US theoretical physicist Richard Feynman in 1948 as an aid for making certain kinds of calculations - we study how physicists in the USA, Japan, and the Soviet Union learned how to use the new tools and put them to work. Something about the diagrammatic tools could be learned from written instructions alone, at a distance from those physicists already ‘in the know’, although this type of transfer proved to be very difficult, slow, and rare. The rate at which new physicists began to use the diagrams in various settings, and the types of uses to which the diagrams were put, reveal the interplay between geopolitics, personal communication, and pedagogical infrastructures in shaping how paper tools spread.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On arXiv moderation system;Journal of Informetrics;2023-08
2. KNOWLEDGE IN MEDIAS RES: TOWARD A MEDIA HISTORY OF SCIENCE, MEDICINE, AND TECHNOLOGY;History and Theory;2020-12
3. The diffusion of scientific innovations: A role typology;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2019-10
4. A Tale of a Tool;History of Political Economy;2019-03-20
5. Magnetrons and quantum electrodynamics: Engineering and physics in the case of tomonaga Sin-itiro;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics;2017-11