Proposed Typology for Ridesourcing Using Survey Data from Tennessee

Author:

Crossland Cassidy1ORCID,Brakewood Candace2ORCID,Guo Jing2ORCID,Cherry Christopher2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. WSP, Raleigh, NC

2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

Abstract

Although ridesourcing users have been studied in literature, it is unlikely that everyone uses ridesourcing homogenously. Identifying a ridesourcing user typology could help to further understand how ridesourcing is used, to better plan and manage these services. This study employed survey data collected in 2019 from residents of three heavily auto-oriented metro areas in Tennessee to generate a ridesourcing user typology based on demographic, socioeconomic, and preference variables. We identified four ridesourcing user and nonuser types: “young urban local users,”“wealthy travelers,”“tagalong users,” and “nonusers.” The young urban local users made up about 20% of the sample and included those who used ridesourcing locally. They tended to use ridesourcing for social purposes, were younger and had higher incomes. These findings aligned with prior research. The wealthy traveler type was comprised of those who used ridesourcing primarily when traveling. Wealthy travelers were older and had higher incomes than other user types. Tagalong users typically rode with friends/family; they tended to be younger, female, and/or Black. Prior research has largely excluded the tagalong user type. The nonuser was the fourth and largest (53%) type. Nonusers were usually older, had lower incomes, and were located in rural areas. Their most common reasons for not using ridesourcing included car ownership, safety concerns, and cost. Understanding the differences between these user types could help practitioners and policy makers better plan for ridesourcing services and integrate them into the operations of local transportation systems, particularly in more autocentric metropolitan areas.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference60 articles.

1. Blystone D. The Story of Uber: Inestopedia, 2019. Updated June 25, 2019. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/111015/story-uber.asp.

2. Greiner A., McFarland M., Sherman I., Tse J. A History of Lyft, from Fuzzy Pink Mustaches to Global Ride Share Giant CNN Business, 2019. Updated April 2, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/03/business/lyft-history/index.html.

3. Mazareanu E. Market Share of the Leading Ride-Hailing Companies in the United States from September 2017 to October 2019. Statista, 2019. Updated December 2, 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/910704/market-share-of-rideshare-companies-united-states/.

4. Uber. 10 Billion Uber Newsroom, 2018. https://www.uber.com/newsroom/10-billion/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3