Moving to Risk-Based Highway Asset Maintenance Using Elicited Data

Author:

Raccuja Gergely1ORCID,Cumming Simon2,Short Gary3ORCID,Graham Thomas2,Morgan Stephen2

Affiliation:

1. National Highways, Manchester, UK

2. Amey PLC, London, UK

3. Darach AI Limited, Dundee, UK

Abstract

This paper presents the journey that the UK’s largest highway asset management organization undertook to move to risk-based and data-driven maintenance decision-making, while maintaining the trust of maintenance managers and despite significant gaps in its asset data. It presents an application of the Sheffield Elicitation Framework approach for obtaining data from subject matter experts and approaches considered for aggregating the elicited data to maintain modeling quality. It outlines the approach taken to modify the elicited data with all available asset information through risk modifiers. It presents validation results for the aggregation method and describes how the outputs of residual risk given a maintenance scenario, and risk reduction per pound spent for maintenance activities, were arrived at. It then shows how they are being used as part of the decision support tool (DST) to optimize cyclic maintenance spend. The DST allows National Highways to maintain their level of service to customers whilst saving millions of pounds a year for UK taxpayers and achieving their asset management objectives, which is particularly pertinent when there is a significant focus on making the best use of limited resources. Because of the methodology it uses, it is also a knowledge management tool that represents a shift from fragmented decision-making based on individual maintenance managers’ tacit knowledge to utilizing the combined wisdom of all maintenance managers in addition to all asset data that is available. The paper concludes with a summary of opportunities for further work.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference10 articles.

1. Standards for Highways. March 2020. https://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/search/e0a134c8-f5e2-4f30-9cda-9e43d047f46e.

2. ISO 31000. November 2009. https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html.

3. SHELF: The Sheffield Elicitation Framework

4. Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities

5. Combining expert knowledge and local data for improved service life modeling of water supply networks

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3