Safety and Operational Effectiveness of Protected Only Versus Protected/Permitted Left-Turn Signal Phase

Author:

Asaduzzaman Md1ORCID,Thapa Raju2ORCID,Codjoe Julius A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA

2. Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA

Abstract

Roadway intersection fatalities account for around 24% of total traffic fatalities each year, with left-turning vehicles associated with most of these crashes. To manage left-turning movements, various left-turn signal phases like protected only (PO), protected/permitted left-turn (PPLT), and flashing yellow arrow (FYA) are currently in use. However, their overall effectiveness has not been well established. The paper evaluates the safety and operational effectiveness of PO over PPLT left-turn signal phase using sample intersections from Louisiana. A total of 151 signalized intersections with uniform left-turn signal phases at all of their approaches were selected. Crash data recorded over five years at those intersections comprising a total of 13,278 crashes, including 1,275 left-turn crashes, were collected. A crash modification factor (CMF) was developed using the negative binomial model (NBM) to assess the safety benefits of PO over PPLT. The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) control delay field measurement technique was used for the operational analysis. The study first developed CMFs for total crashes and only left-turn crashes at various severity levels. CMF of PO over PPLT revealed that PO significantly reduced all severity levels of left-turn crashes by more than 50%, however, it was only able to reduce injury and fatal total crashes. Second, the study found average control delay at PO (50.69 s/vehicle) significantly higher than at PPLT (46.04 s/vehicle). The difference in delay was only significant during the morning peak hour. Overall, from both safety and operation perspectives, the results indicate that PO performs better than PPLT.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference35 articles.

1. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx. Accessed April 20, 2021.

2. Highway Safety Research Group. Section D - Where Crashes Occur. D7: Fatal and Injury Crashes by Intersection. Center for Analytics & Research in Transportation Safety, Baton Rouge, LA. http://datareports.lsu.edu/reports.aspx?p=ci&yr=2018&rpt=D7. Accessed April 20, 2021.

3. Right-Angle Crash Injury Severity Analysis Using Ordered Probability Models

4. Comprehensive analysis of vehicle–pedestrian crashes at intersections in Florida

5. Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3