“Trends Come and Go”: Early Childhood Rural Special Education Teachers’ Use of Reported Practices During Mathematics Instruction

Author:

Peltier Corey1ORCID,Peltier Tiffany K.1ORCID,Hott Brittany L.1ORCID,Heuer Andrew1,Werthen Taylor1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA

Abstract

Data suggest students are not meeting grade-level expectations in mathematics. If high-quality instruction is not provided, the inequitable outcomes observed in schools will be maintained. The goal of this study was to identify the frequency in which rural special education teachers (SETs) serving students in prekindergarten through third grade self-report using practices during mathematics instruction. A secondary focus was to investigate whether rural SETs differed in their reported use of practices compared with (a) suburban and urban SETs and (b) rural general education teachers. Data from 901 teachers serving students in prekindergarten through third grade were retained. Of this sample, 150 teachers identified as SETs in rural ( n = 55), suburban ( n = 50), and urban ( n = 45) schools. Results suggest teachers reported using research-based and unsubstantiated practices frequently. Rural SETs reported using research-based and unsubstantiated practices with similar frequency to urban SETs. Suburban SETs reported using explicit instruction more frequently than rural SETs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Development,Education

Reference68 articles.

1. Ansari D., Lyons I. M. (2016). Cognitive neuroscience and mathematics learning: How far have we come? Where do we need to go? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0782-z

2. Archibald S., Coggshall J. G., Croft A., Goe L. (2011). High-quality professional development for all teachers: Effectively allocating resources [Research & policy brief]. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520732.pdf

3. Baker B. D. & Albert Shanker Institute. (2016). Does money matter in education? (2nd ed.). Albert Shanker Institute. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED563793&site=ehost-live

4. Bouck E. C., Park J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0003

5. Browder D. M., Spooner F., Ahlgrim-Delzell L., Wakeman S. Y., Harris A. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Introducing the Science of Math;TEACHING Exceptional Children;2023-05-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3