Affiliation:
1. The University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA
Abstract
Data suggest students are not meeting grade-level expectations in mathematics. If high-quality instruction is not provided, the inequitable outcomes observed in schools will be maintained. The goal of this study was to identify the frequency in which rural special education teachers (SETs) serving students in prekindergarten through third grade self-report using practices during mathematics instruction. A secondary focus was to investigate whether rural SETs differed in their reported use of practices compared with (a) suburban and urban SETs and (b) rural general education teachers. Data from 901 teachers serving students in prekindergarten through third grade were retained. Of this sample, 150 teachers identified as SETs in rural ( n = 55), suburban ( n = 50), and urban ( n = 45) schools. Results suggest teachers reported using research-based and unsubstantiated practices frequently. Rural SETs reported using research-based and unsubstantiated practices with similar frequency to urban SETs. Suburban SETs reported using explicit instruction more frequently than rural SETs.
Reference68 articles.
1. Ansari D., Lyons I. M. (2016). Cognitive neuroscience and mathematics learning: How far have we come? Where do we need to go? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0782-z
2. Archibald S., Coggshall J. G., Croft A., Goe L. (2011). High-quality professional development for all teachers: Effectively allocating resources [Research & policy brief]. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520732.pdf
3. Baker B. D. & Albert Shanker Institute. (2016). Does money matter in education? (2nd ed.). Albert Shanker Institute. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED563793&site=ehost-live
4. Bouck E. C., Park J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0003
5. Browder D. M., Spooner F., Ahlgrim-Delzell L., Wakeman S. Y., Harris A. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Introducing the Science of Math;TEACHING Exceptional Children;2023-05-12