Physical therapists’ experience using focus on therapeutic outcome in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study

Author:

Bekmuratova Sarbinaz1ORCID,Bahle-Lampe Angela1,Pflaster Travis2

Affiliation:

1. Occupational Therapy, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA

2. Rehab Administration, CHI Health Immanuel, Omaha, NE, USA

Abstract

While patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are used in many practice settings as a standardized system of outcome measures, various factors may impact the meaningful use of PROMs by clinicians operating in various settings. Very limited research exists that focused on examining the use of FOTO® in outpatient rehabilitation settings. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators in achieving FOTO® treatment completion rates and patient functional outcomes among physical therapists. Additionally, the study aimed to explore the internal acceptance of FOTO as a useful tool in rehabilitation from the perspectives of physical therapists. Qualitative data were collected through four focus group interviews with physical therapists at outpatient rehabilitation clinics. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and transcribed, and qualitative content analysis was applied for data analysis. Four major themes emerged from qualitative data analyses including (a) use of FOTO® in clinical practice, (b) reasons why the FOTO® process may not be followed, (c), therapists’ perceptions of FOTO®, and (d) perceived barriers and enablers related to FOTO®. The study concluded that multi-level determinants impact the successful use of FOTO® by therapists in outpatient rehabilitation settings. The findings have important implications for clinical practice, organizational leaders, and PROM developers.

Funder

Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship Faculty Research Fund

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. National Quality Forum. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in performance measurement, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Downloads/Blueprint.pdf (2013, accessed 10 February, 2021).

2. National Quality Forum. Advancing measurement to reflect the patient’s voice, http://www.qualityforum.org/What_is_a_PRO.aspx (2020, accessed 12 February 2021).

3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. CMS measures management system blueprint, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Downloads/Blueprint.pdf (2020, accessed 17 January, 2021).

4. Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3