The effectiveness of botulinum toxin for chronic tension-type headache prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Dhanasekara Chathurika S1ORCID,Payberah Daniel2,Chyu Joanna Y3,Shen Chwan-Li456,Kahathuduwa Chanaka N5678

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

2. School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

3. School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA

4. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

5. Center of Excellence for Integrative Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

6. Center of Excellence for Translational Neuroscience and Therapeutics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

8. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA

Abstract

BackgroundA systematic and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the evidence of the effects of botulinum toxin A on chronic tension-type headache.MethodsCochrane, Embase, Ovid, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science databases, and ClinicallTrials.gov registry were systematically searched for studies examining the effects of botulinum toxin A on tension-type headaches. The records were screened by two independent reviewers using pre-determined eligibility criteria. DerSimonian Liard random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the ‘meta’ package (5.2-0) in R (4.2.0). Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool RoB 2 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Clinical significance was determined using pre-defined minimal clinically important differences.ResultsEleven controlled trials were included (390 botulinum toxin A, 297 controls). Botulinum toxin A was associated with significant improvements in standardized headache intensity (−0.502 standard deviations [−0.945, −0.058]), headache frequency (−2.830 days/month [−4.082, −1.578]), daily headache duration (−0.965 [−1.860, −0.069]) and the frequency of acute pain medication use (−2.200 days/month [−3.485, −0.915]) vs controls. Botulinum toxin A-associated improvements exceeded minimal clinically important differences for headache intensity, frequency, and acute pain medication use. A 79% (28%, 150%) greater response rate was observed for botulinum toxin A vs controls in improving chronic tension-type headache. Treatment of eight chronic tension-type headache patients was sufficient to elicit a therapeutic response in one patient.ConclusionsCorroborating the current mechanistic evidence, our meta-analysis supports the utility of botulinum toxin A for managing chronic tension-type headaches. However, due to limitations in the quality of evidence, adequately-powered high-quality controlled trials examining the effects of Botulinum toxin A on chronic tension-type headache are warranted.RegistrationProtocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020178616)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3