Continuous positive airway pressure in cluster headache: A randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind, crossover study

Author:

Gravdahl Gøril Bruvik123ORCID,Aakerøy Lars45,Stovner Lars Jacob123,Engstrøm Morten16,Müller Kai Ivar78,Bjørk Marte Helene3910ORCID,Tronvik Erling123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

2. Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

3. NorHEAD, Norwegian Headache Research Centre, Norway

4. Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

5. Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

6. Department of Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, St. Olav University Hospital

7. Department of Neurology and National Neuromuscular Centre, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway

8. Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

9. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

10. Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Background Oxygen inhalation aborts cluster headache attacks, and case reports show the effect of continuous positive airway pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic effect of continuous positive airway pressure in chronic cluster headache. Methods This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blind crossover study using active and sham continuous positive airway pressure treatment for chronic cluster headache. Patients entered a one month’s baseline period before randomly being assigned to two months’ active continuous positive airway pressure treatment followed by a four weeks’ washout period and two months’ sham continuous positive airway pressure or vice versa. Primary outcome measure was number of cluster headache attacks/week. Results Of the 30 included participants (12 males, median age 49.5 years, min-max 20–66 years), 25 completed both treatment/sham cycles (two discontinued, three lost to follow-up). The median number of cluster headache attacks per week was reduced from 8.25 (0.75–89.75) attacks to 6.25 (0–56.00) attacks for active continuous positive airway pressure and to 7.50 (0.50–43.75) attacks for sham continuous positive airway pressure, but there was no difference in active versus sham (p = 0.904). One patient had a serious adverse event during active treatment, none occurred during sham treatment. Conclusions Continuous positive airway pressure treatment did not reduce the number of cluster headache attacks compared to sham treatment in chronic cluster headache patients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03397563

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3