‘We have so much to offer’: Community members’ perspectives on autism research

Author:

Haar Tori123,Brownlow Charlotte24,Hall Gabrielle15,Heyworth Melanie123,Lawson Wenn12,Poulsen Rebecca123,Reinisch Tamara5,Pellicano Elizabeth126ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie University, Australia

2. Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC), Australia

3. Reframing Autism, Australia

4. University of Southern Queensland, Australia

5. ORIMA Research, Australia

6. University College London, UK

Abstract

Autism research is on the cusp of significant change. There are mounting calls from Autistic self-advocates, researchers, and other scientists for a paradigm shift in autism research. Yet little is known about what non-academic members of the Autistic and autism communities think about autism research. We – a team of Autistic and non-autistic researchers – addressed this gap by conducting a secondary analysis of data collected as part of an in-depth research priority-setting exercise in Australia. Specifically, we asked: what are community members’ views and experiences of autism research? In immersive online text-based focus-group discussions held over 10 days, 55 community members, including Autistic people, family members, and professionals, shared their perspectives and experiences of autism research. We analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis, adopting an inductive approach. Respondents resoundingly agreed that autism research could play a powerful role in helping to shape good Autistic lives, yet they felt that to do that effectively, major changes were needed. These included a shift away from overly narrow, deficits-based views of Autistic people to a greater focus on contextual factors, and more community-led decisions in what is researched and how. These findings highlight new possibilities for research processes, findings, and translation. Lay Abstract Autism research is changing. Autistic activists and researchers want Autistic people in the community to have more of a say about what is researched and how. But we haven’t asked people in the community what they think. This study used the information obtained from 55 community members, including Autistic people, their families, and professionals working with Autistic people, from an existing study on their priorities for autism research. We re-looked at what was said to see if we could understand community members’ views and experiences of autism research. People agreed strongly that research can play a powerful role in shaping good Autistic lives. They also felt that big changes were needed for research to do this. Some of these changes were that researchers should stop thinking about autism narrowly and in a negative way, where Autistic people are seen as the problem. Researchers need to think more about how to improve systems, experiences and how other people respond to Autistic people. They also want the autism community to be more involved in what is researched and how it is researched. The findings from our study here highlight the potential for research to be positive when Autistic people and their families are listened to, approached with understanding, and are respected and valued as individuals in the research process.

Funder

Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism

Australian Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference90 articles.

1. Australian Autism Research Council. (2019). Australian Autism Research Council: 2019 Research priorities. https://www.autismcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/2019-10/AARC%202019%20Autism%20Research%20Priorities.pdf

2. Australian Autism Research Council. (2021). Australian Autism Research Council: 2020-21 Research priority update. https://www.autismcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/aarc/AARC_2020-21_Research_Priority_Update.pdf

3. Positioning, strategizing, and charming: how students with autism construct identities in relation to disability

4. Botha M. (2021). Academic, activist, or advocate? Angry, entangled, and emerging: A critical reflection on autism knowledge production. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 727542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727542

5. Botha M., Cage E. (2022). ‘Autism research is in crisis’: A mixed method study of researcher’s constructions of autistic people and autism research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1050897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050897

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3