Team Cognition in Handoffs: Relating System Factors, Team Cognition Functions and Outcomes in Two Handoff Processes

Author:

Wooldridge Abigail R.1ORCID,Carayon Pascale23ORCID,Hoonakker Peter2ORCID,Hose Bat-Zion4ORCID,Shaffer David W.5ORCID,Brazelton Tom6ORCID,Eithun Ben6ORCID,Rusy Deborah6ORCID,Ross Joshua6,Kohler Jonathan7ORCID,Kelly Michelle M.6ORCID,Springman Scott6ORCID,Gurses Ayse P.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

2. Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

3. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

4. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

5. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA

6. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

7. UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA

8. Center for Health Care Human Factors, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Schools of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Objective This study investigates how team cognition occurs in care transitions from operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU). We then seek to understand how the sociotechnical system and team cognition are related. Background Effective handoffs are critical to ensuring patient safety and have been the subject of many improvement efforts. However, the types of team-level cognitive processing during handoffs have not been explored, nor is it clear how the sociotechnical system shapes team cognition. Method We conducted this study in an academic, Level 1 trauma center in the Midwestern United States. Twenty-eight physicians (surgery, anesthesia, pediatric critical care) and nurses (OR, ICU) participated in semi-structured interviews. We performed qualitative content analysis and epistemic network analysis to understand the relationships between system factors, team cognition in handoffs and outcomes. Results Participants described three team cognition functions in handoffs—(1) information exchange, (2) assessment, and (3) planning and decision making; information exchange was mentioned most. Work system factors influenced team cognition. Inter-professional handoffs facilitated information exchange but included large teams with diverse backgrounds communicating, which can be inefficient. Intra-professional handoffs decreased team size and role diversity, which may simplify communication but increase information loss. Participants in inter-professional handoffs reflected on outcomes significantly more in relation to system factors and team cognition ( p < 0.001), while participants in intra-professional handoffs discussed handoffs as a task. Conclusion Handoffs include team cognition, which was influenced by work system design. Opportunities for handoff improvement include a flexibly standardized process and supportive tools/technologies. We recommend incorporating perspectives of the patient and family in future work.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Science Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3