Population Stereotypes for Objects and Representations: Response Tendencies for Interacting With Everyday Objects and Interfaces

Author:

Vu Kim-Phuong L.1,Sun Yuting1

Affiliation:

1. California State University Long Beach, USA

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to replicate and extend population stereotypes from a broad range of users for display-control relations of common interfaces using pictures/images of the objects. Background: Population stereotypes for display-control configurations refer to people’s tendencies to associate certain control actions with display properties. An interface will benefit by being designed in a manner that is consistent with the stereotypes. The stimuli used in the present study include conceptual replications of objects that have been examined previously and new ones. Method: An online survey was designed to collect data about participants’ natural response tendencies or interpretations of the meaning associated with objects, representations, and colors. Participants were obtained through MTurk from the United States, India, and UK. Results: We replicated 76% and partially replicated an additional 16% of the stereotypic responses found in prior studies. Considering the full data set, we found stereotypic responses for 62% of the stimuli that are consistent across the three countries in which the participants were located, although the strength of these stereotypes may differ by location. For the remaining 38% of the stimuli, population stereotypes still emerged for some locations. Few gender differences were found. Conclusion: Cross-cultural stereotypic responses exist for many objects, representations, and display-control configurations. However, because stereotypes can be limited to specific regions or change over time, we recommend that they be captured periodically to ensure design guidelines based on the stereotypes remain valid. Application: Designers can use the stereotypic responses to guide design decisions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. On the nature of action–sentence compatibility effects.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition;2024-02-22

2. Don’t Accept All and Continue: Exploring Nudges for More Deliberate Interaction with Tracking Consent Notices;ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction;2023-11-29

3. Comprehension of international safety signs: A prospective technical workers context;International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics;2023-11

4. A Study on the Intuitive Design of Target Search Tasks under Time and Information Pressure;Brain Sciences;2022-10-28

5. SELECTION AND CONTROL OF ACTION;HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS;2021-08-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3