Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
Abstract
Introduction A minority of geriatric hip fracture patients pursue non-operative treatment. Compared with surgical patients, non-operative patients have higher mortality rates. However, patient satisfaction following non-operative vs operative treatment has not been investigated extensively. The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction among non-operatively vs operatively treated hip fracture patients. Methods We identified patients aged 60+ years with proximal femur fractures treated over a 10-year period. Excluded were patients with isolated greater/lesser trochanteric fractures. Patients or relatives were asked to complete a 6-question survey about their treatment satisfaction. Results Survey responses from 56 operative and 28 non-operative patients were recorded. Overall, 91.1% of operative and 82.1% of non-operative patients were satisfied with their treatment course ( P = 0.260). However, only 71.4% of non-operative patients were satisfied with treatment option explanations vs 83.9% of operative patients ( P = 0.014). While only 64.3% of non-operative respondents were satisfied with the ultimate treatment outcome (vs 85.7% of operative patients, P = 0.025), 89.3% of patients in each cohort would choose the same treatment plan again. Discussion Our findings highlight the complexity of defining patient satisfaction, particularly in a geriatric hip fracture population. Unlike previous studies, we chose a direct approach to quantifying patient satisfaction by asking participants specifically about satisfaction with treatment outcome and the overall treatment course. Additional survey questions were then included to assess factors considered important in treatment satisfaction, such as health care provider treatment explanations, post-treatment mobility, and palliative care service involvement. Conclusions We identified significant differences between non-operatively and operatively treated geriatric hip fracture patients regarding satisfaction with the explanation of treatment options, and ultimate treatment outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction with the treatment course or likelihood of choosing the same treatment again. Further research investigating patient satisfaction following geriatric hip fracture treatment is warranted.
Funder
Herman and Gwendolyn Shapiro Foundation
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
Reference17 articles.
1. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review
2. The 1-Year Mortality of Patients Treated in a Hip Fracture Program for Elders
3. Mather M, Scommenga P, Kilduff L. Fact sheet: Aging in the United States. Population Reference Bureau web site. 2019. (Accessed August 20, 2019). Available at https://www.prb.org/aging-unitedstates-fact-sheet/
4. Incidence and Mortality of Hip Fractures in the United States