Study on the Organoleptic Intensity Scale for Measuring Oral Malodor

Author:

Greenman J.12345,Duffield J.12345,Spencer P.12345,Rosenberg M.12345,Corry D.12345,Saad S.12345,Lenton P.12345,Majerus G.12345,Nachnani S.12345,El-Maaytah M.12345

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK;

2. Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel;

3. University of Minnesota, 515 Delaware St., SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455;

4. University Health Resources Group, 5714, Canterbury Drive, Culver City, CA 90230; and

5. School of Dentistry, Jordan University, Amman, Jordan;

Abstract

The 0–5 organoleptic scale is used widely in breath research and in trials to measure the efficacy of anti-odor agents. However, the precise relationship between odor scores and gas concentrations of target odorants is unknown. The purpose of this study was to relate mean organoleptic scores from odor judges (n = 7) for pure odorants (n = 8) representative of those found in oral malodor. Judges used a common 0–5 scale to report the odor intensity of sample sets in random order of concentration. Regression analysis of data showed that odor score was proportional to the log concentration of odorant, and comparison of slopes showed H2S to be the most significant in terms of odor power. Detection thresholds (mol.dm−3) were: Skatole (7.2 × 10−13) < methylmercaptan (1.0 × 10−11) < trimethylamine (1.8 × 10−11) < isovalerate (1.8 × 10−11) < butyrate (2.3 × 10−10) < hydrogen sulphide (6.4 × 10−10) < putrescine (9.1 × 10−10) < dimethyl disulphide (5.9 × 10−8). The study demonstrates the exponential nature of the olfactory response and shows that any single compound’s contribution to malodor depends on odor power and threshold in addition to concentration.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference13 articles.

1. An Investigation of Stenches and Odors for Industrial 'Purposes.

2. PSYCHOPHYSICAL SCALING OF ODOR INTENSITY AND QUALITY

3. Hartley MG, McKenzie C, Greenman J, El-Maaytah MA, Scully C, Porter S (1999). Tongue microbiota and malodour: effects of metronidazole mouthrinse on tongue microbiota and breath odour. Micro Ecol Health Dis 11:226–233.

4. Rosenberg M (2002). The science of bad breath. Sci Am 286:72–79.

5. Measurement of Oral Malodor: Current Methods and Future Prospects

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3