Integration of primary care and palliative care services to improve equality and equity at the end-of-life: Findings from realist stakeholder workshops

Author:

Mitchell Sarah1ORCID,Turner Nicola2,Fryer Kate3,Aunger Justin4,Beng Jude3,Couchman Emilie5,Leach Isabel3,Bayly Joanne67ORCID,Gardiner Clare5ORCID,Sleeman Katherine E7ORCID,Evans Catherine J78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Primary Care, Palliative Care and Public Health, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

2. University of Nottingham School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

3. Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

4. NIHR Midlands Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Murray Learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

5. Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

6. St Barnabas Hospices, Worthing, UK

7. Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK

8. Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Crawley, UK

Abstract

Background: Inequalities in access to palliative and end of life care are longstanding. Integration of primary and palliative care has the potential to improve equity in the community. Evidence to inform integration is scarce as research that considers integration of primary care and palliative care services is rare. Aim: To address the questions: ‘how can inequalities in access to community palliative and end of life care be improved through the integration of primary and palliative care, and what are the benefits?’ Design: A theory-driven realist inquiry with two stakeholder workshops to explore how, when and why inequalities can be improved through integration. Realist analysis leading to explanatory context(c)-mechanism(m)-outcome(o) configurations(c) (CMOCs). Findings: A total of 27 participants attended online workshops (July and September 2022): patient and public members ( n = 6), commissioners ( n = 2), primary care ( n = 5) and specialist palliative care professionals ( n = 14). Most were White British ( n = 22), other ethnicities were Asian ( n = 3), Black African ( n = 1) and British mixed race ( n = 1). Power imbalances and racism hinder people from ethnic minority backgrounds accessing current services. Shared commitment to addressing these across palliative care and primary care is required in integrated partnerships. Partnership functioning depends on trusted relationships and effective communication, enabled by co-location and record sharing. Positive patient experiences provide affirmation for the multi-disciplinary team, grow confidence and drive improvements. Conclusions: Integration to address inequalities needs recognition of current barriers. Integration grounded in trust, faith and confidence can lead to a cycle of positive patient, carer and professional experience. Prioritising inequalities as whole system concern is required for future service delivery and research.

Funder

health technology assessment programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Primary palliative care: Onwards and upwards!;Palliative Medicine;2024-09-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3