Measuring attitudes towards the dying process: A systematic review of tools

Author:

Groebe Bernadette12,Strupp Julia2,Eisenmann Yvonne2,Schmidt Holger2,Schlomann Anna13,Rietz Christian4,Voltz Raymond2567

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral Programme GROW ‘Gerontological Research on Well-Being’, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

2. Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

3. Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

4. Department of Educational Science, Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences, University of Education Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

5. Centre for Health Services Research of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

6. Centre for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

7. Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Background: At the end of life, anxious attitudes concerning the dying process are common in patients in Palliative Care. Measurement tools can identify vulnerabilities, resources and the need for subsequent treatment to relieve suffering and support well-being. Aim: To systematically review available tools measuring attitudes towards dying, their operationalization, the method of measurement and the methodological quality including generalizability to different contexts. Design: Systematic review according to the PRISMA Statement. Methodological quality of tools assessed by standardized review criteria. Data sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsyndexTests and the Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched from their inception to April 2017. Results: A total of 94 identified studies reported the development and/or validation of 44 tools. Of these, 37 were questionnaires and 7 alternative measurement methods (e.g. projective measures). In 34 of 37 questionnaires, the emotional evaluation (e.g. anxiety) towards dying is measured. Dying is operationalized in general items ( n = 20), in several specific aspects of dying ( n = 34) and as dying of others ( n = 14). Methodological quality of tools was reported inconsistently. Nine tools reported good internal consistency. Of 37 tools, 4 were validated in a clinical sample (e.g. terminal cancer; Huntington disease), indicating questionable generalizability to clinical contexts for most tools. Conclusion: Many tools exist to measure attitudes towards the dying process using different endpoints. This overview can serve as decision framework on which tool to apply in which contexts. For clinical application, only few tools were available. Further validation of existing tools and potential alternative methods in various populations is needed.

Funder

North Rhine-Westphalian funding scheme “Fortschrittskollegs”

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3