Communicating end-of-life care goals and decision-making among a multidisciplinary geriatric inpatient rehabilitation team: A qualitative descriptive study

Author:

Bloomer Melissa J1234ORCID,Botti Mari123,Runacres Fiona5678,Poon Peter569,Barnfield Jakqui1011,Hutchinson Alison M124

Affiliation:

1. Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

2. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

3. Epworth/Deakin Centre for Clinical Nursing Research, Richmond, VIC, Australia

4. Centre for Nursing Research, Deakin University and Monash Health Partnership, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia

5. Supportive and Palliative Care Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia

6. School of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

7. Department of Palliative Care, Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, South Caulfield, VIC, Australia

8. The University of Notre Dame, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia

9. Eastern Palliative Care Association, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

10. Rehabilitation, Aged Persons Mental Health and Residential Services, Clayton, VIC, Australia

11. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Background: In geriatric inpatient rehabilitation settings, where the goal is to optimise function, providing end-of-life care can be challenging. Aim: The aim of this study is to explore how end-of-life care goals and decision-making are communicated in a geriatric inpatient rehabilitation setting. Design: The design is a qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured individual and group interviews. Setting/participants: This study was conducted in a 154-bed facility in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, providing geriatric inpatient rehabilitation for older patients; medical, nursing and allied health clinicians, who had cared for an inpatient who died, were recruited. Data collection: Participants were interviewed using a conversational approach, guided by an ‘aide memoire’. Results: A total of 19 clinicians participated in this study, with 12 interviewed individually and the remaining 7 clinicians participating in group interviews. The typical patient was described as older, frail and with complex needs. Clinicians described the challenge of identifying patients who were deteriorating towards death, with some relying on others to inform them. How patient deterioration and decision-making was communicated among the team varied. Communication with the patient/family about dying was expected but did not always occur, nor was it always documented. Some clinicians relied on documentation, such as commencement of a dying care pathway to indicate when a patient was dying. Conclusion: Clinicians reported difficulties recognising patient deterioration towards death. Uncertainty and inconsistent communication among clinicians about patient deterioration negatively impacted team understanding, decision-making, and patient and family communication. Further education for all members of the multidisciplinary team focusing on how to recognise and communicate impending death will aid multidisciplinary teams to provide quality end-of-life care when required.

Funder

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Health topics: ageing, http://www.who.int/topics/ageing/en/(2017, accessed 19 January 2017).

2. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Chronic disease prevention and health promotion: multiple chronic conditions, 2016, http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/multiple-chronic.htm

3. Inflammation in Aging Part 2: Implications for the Health of Older People and Recommendations for Nursing Practice

4. Caring for Patients Dying with Dementia: Challenges in Subacute Care in Australia

5. People with dementia and the hospital environment: the view of patients and family carers

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3