Achieving the preferred place of care for hospitalized patients at the end of life

Author:

Gerrard Ruth1,Campbell Janet2,Minton Ollie3,Moback Berit1,Skinner Charles4,McGowan Catherine4,Stone Patrick Charles5

Affiliation:

1. CNS in Palliative Care, 2nd floor Clare House, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

2. Clinical Audit Officer, Knightsbridge Wing, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

3. Cancer Research UK Clinical Research Training Fellow and Honorary Consultant in Palliative Medicine, St George's University of London, Division of Mental Health, 6th floor Hunter Wing, London, UK

4. Consultant in Palliative Medicine, 2nd floor Clare House, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

5. Macmillan Reader in Palliative Medicine, St George's University of London, Division of Mental Health, 6th floor Hunter Wing, London, UK

Abstract

Background: The Department of Health end-of-life strategy contains a number of quality markers which include taking into account patients’ wishes for their final place of care. There is a wide variation in how this information is recorded. Methods: An audit was conducted on discussion of preferred place of care (PPC) for all patients referred to the hospital palliative care team who died during the audit period. Barriers to achieving PPC and the efficacy of a fast track discharge service were also monitored. The audit was first done in 2007 and was repeated in 2009. Results: There was an increase in recording PPC. Overall PPC wishes were ascertained for 87% of the patients seen by the team. The PPC was achieved in 76% of cases. The number of patients wishing to die in hospital significantly increased over the audit cycle (from 10% to 30%). Approximately one-third of patients changed their minds regarding PPC. Conclusions: The data highlights the need to distinguish between preferred place of care and preferred place of death. Patients’ wishes regarding PPC change as death approaches. A greater number of patients wished to die in hospital than was expected.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3