Online training improves medical students’ ability to recognise when a person is dying: The ORaClES randomised controlled trial

Author:

White Nicola1ORCID,Oostendorp Linda JM1,Tomlinson Christopher2,Yardley Sarah13,Ricciardi Federico14,Gökalp Hülya56,Minton Ollie7ORCID,Boland Jason W8ORCID,Clark Ben9,Harries Priscilla610,Stone Patrick1

Affiliation:

1. Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK

2. Bioinformatics Data Science Group, Imperial College London, London, UK

3. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

4. Department of Statistical Science, University College London (UCL), London, UK

5. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK

7. Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK

8. Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK

9. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

10. Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George’s, University of London, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Recognising dying is a key clinical skill for doctors, yet there is little training. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of an online training resource designed to enhance medical students’ ability to recognise dying. Design: Online multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial (NCT03360812). The training resource for the intervention group was developed from a group of expert palliative care doctors’ weightings of various signs/symptoms to recognise dying. The control group received no training. Setting/participants: Participants were senior UK medical students. They reviewed 92 patient summaries and provided a probability of death within 72 hours (0% certain survival – 100% certain death) pre, post, and 2 weeks after the training. Primary outcome: (1) Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) score between participants’ and the experts’ scores, immediately post intervention. Secondary outcomes: (2) weight attributed to each factor, (3) learning effect and (4) level of expertise (Cochran–Weiss–Shanteau (CWS)). Results: Out of 168 participants, 135 completed the trial (80%); 66 received the intervention (49%). After using the training resource, the intervention group had better agreement with the experts in their survival estimates ( δMAD = −3.43, 95% CI −0.11 to −0.34, p = <0.001) and weighting of clinical factors. There was no learning effect of the MAD scores at the 2-week time point ( δMAD = 1.50, 95% CI −0.87 to 3.86, p = 0.21). At the 2-week time point, the intervention group was statistically more expert in their decision-making versus controls (intervention CWS = 146.04 (SD 140.21), control CWS = 110.75 (SD 104.05); p = 0.01). Conclusion: The online training resource proved effective in altering the decision-making of medical students to agree more with expert decision-making.

Funder

Marie Curie Cancer Care

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Recognizing that it is part and parcel of what they do: teaching palliative care to medical students in the UK

2. Palliative Medicine Review: Prognostication

3. Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life * Commentary: a "good death" is possible in the NHS

4. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s Doctors: outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education, 2009, http://www.ub.edu/medicina_unitateducaciomedica/documentos/TomorrowsDoctors_2009.pdf

5. Neuberger J, Guthrie C, Aaronovitch D. More care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (ed. Department of Health CC), 2013, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212450/Liverpool_Care_Pathway.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3