Measuring the quality of end-of-life care: Development, testing, and cultural validation of the Danish version of Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form

Author:

Ross Lone1,Neergaard Mette Asbjoern2,Petersen Morten Aagaard1,Groenvold Mogens13

Affiliation:

1. The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg/Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen NV, Denmark

2. The Palliative Care Team, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark

3. Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark

Abstract

Background: The perspectives of patients and relatives are important in the improvement of the quality of health care. However, the quality of end-of-life care has not been systematically evaluated in Scandinavia. Aim: To develop or adapt and subsequently validate a questionnaire assessing the quality of end-of-life care in Denmark. The questionnaire was intended for bereaved relatives in order to assess the quality of care in the last 3 months of the patient’s life and the circumstances surrounding death. Design and data sources: Based on the literature and interviews with 15 bereaved relatives and 17 healthcare professionals, relevant topics to include in a questionnaire were identified. The topics were prioritized by 100 bereaved relatives and subsequently compared to existing questionnaires. The chosen questionnaire was tested by cognitive interviews with 36 bereaved relatives. Results: Most of the important topics were covered by the Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form, but not all Danish settings (e.g. home care by a palliative team) were covered. These settings were added to the Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form, and a few adaptations were made before a Danish version of the Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form was tested by cognitive interviews. This cultural validation showed that the slightly adapted Danish version was perceived as relevant, understandable, and acceptable. Furthermore, the cognitive interviews gave insight in the comprehension and interpretation of Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form items. Conclusion: With a few adaptations, the British Views of Informal Carers’ Evaluation of Services–Short Form was relevant in a Danish setting.

Funder

Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond

TrygFonden

Kræftens Bekæmpelse

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3