Ethics and the Promotion of Inclusiveness Within Qualitative Research: Case Examples From Asia and the Pacific

Author:

Czymoniewicz-Klippel Melina T.1,Brijnath Bianca2,Crockett Belinda3

Affiliation:

1. The Pennsylvania State University, , Monash University

2. Monash University

3. Monash University, Knox Community Health Service, Australia

Abstract

Qualitative researchers are often confronted by ethical challenges when making research decisions because current guidelines and principles guiding research ethics do not wholly cover the concerns that can arise in complex social research situations. In this article, the authors explore this dilemma in relation to our experiences of conducting sensitive qualitative research with vulnerable groups in developing countries of Asia and the Pacific. With a focus on informed consent, the authors offer three case examples to explicate the difficulties faced in matching ethics theory with proforma approval requirements, which may limit the application of more expansive approaches to research design. To conclude, the authors put forth recommendations for modifications to the ethics system as a whole to promote greater collaboration and inclusion of qualitative researchers to the review and practice of research ethics in Australia.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology

Reference52 articles.

1. Men ofKastomand the Customs of Men: Status, Legitimacy and Persistent Values in Lihir, Papua New Guinea

2. Bartlett, H. & Martin, W. ( 2002). Ethical issues in dementia care research. In H. Wilkinson (Ed.), The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivation (pp. 47-62). London : Jessica Kingsley.

3. Battiste, M. ( 2006). Research ethics for protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: Institutional and researcher responsibilities. In N.K. Denzin & M.D. Giardina (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge (pp. 111-132).Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3