A Wild Multiple Apparatus of Knowing Discussion

Abstract

This is a heterodidactic neuroscience, not materiality of language discussion. It is an article on intra-observation as research methodology, thus auditory, visual, cultural, syntactic, and paratactical body/mind/brain possibilities of words—Thinking ontology for post-qualitative methodology. Indirectly, it is about linguistic accountability of the event of/in education; the event of/in research—Thought in the act and/or bodily awareness in the moment: Nodal point waiting pentimento performances . . . and Jasmine. It might therefore be about a whole new transdisciplinary and humble body/mind/brain, education and research field all together, or about being a bit wild in the brain, and/to transfer something across areas and learning. It is a schizoanalysis crafting of knowledge attempt becoming data wise in action. My goal and hope are to foster self-reflexive think-languages and practices in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) Institutions and schools. It is a professionalizing method.