Prognostic role of plasma galectin-3 levels in acute coronary syndrome

Author:

Obeid Slayman1,Yousif Nooraldaem12,Davies Allan3,Loretz Ruben1,Saleh Lanja4,Niederseer David1,Noor Husam A2,Amin Haitham2,Mach François5,Gencer Baris5,Räber Lorenz6,Windecker Stephan6,Templin Christian1,Nanchen David7,Rodondi Nicolas89,Muller Olivier10,Matter Christian M111,von Eckardstein Arnold4,Lüscher Thomas F311

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

2. Mohammed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Centre, Kingdom of Bahrain

3. Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals and Imperial College, UK

4. Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

5. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitaire de Geneve, Switzerland

6. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

7. Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

8. Department of General Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

9. Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland

10. Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Switzerland

11. Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Aim: Cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and galectin-3 have emerged as biomarker candidates to predict cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in the general population as well as in patients with coronary artery or renal disease. However, their predictive role and clinical utility in patients with acute coronary syndromes alone or in combination beyond currently used risk scores remains to be determined. Methods and results: Cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and galectin-3 were measured in plasmas of 1832 patients at the time of presentation with acute coronary syndromes requiring percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular events, any repeat revascularization or myocardial infarction) and all-cause mortality after 1 year and occurred in 192 (10.5%) and 78 (4.3%) of patients, respectively. All three biomarkers were increased in those with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events compared with those without (p<0.001). However, only galectin-3 (all-cause mortality: hazard ratio=1.027 (95% confidence interval (1.011–1.043); p=0.001), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: hazard ratio=1.025 (95% confidence interval (1.012–1.037); p<0.001)) but not cystatin C nor neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin emerged as independent predictors of both major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and death. The risks were particularly high in the highest quartile of galectin-3. The integration of galectin-3 into the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score improved the prediction of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and all-cause mortality significantly. The areas under the receiver operator characteristics curves increased from 0.6701 to 0.6932 for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p=0.0474) and from 0.804 to 0.8199 for all-cause mortality (p=0.0197). Finally, we applied net reclassification improvement index using different cut-offs for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events which showed negative results (for the cut-offs of 5% and 15%, net reclassification improvement index 0.028, p=0.586, for the cut-offs of 10% and 20%, net reclassification improvement index 0.072, p=0.1132 and for the cut-offs of 10% and 30% the net reclassification improvement index is 0.0843, p=0.077). Conclusion: In acute coronary syndromes patients, galectin-3 has moderate prognostic accuracy, provides statistically significant incremental value in some, but not all models, and that the magnitude of any improvement would seem of questionable clinical value.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/ (2017, accessed 18 March 2020).

2. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis;Falk;J Am Coll Cardiol,2006

3. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making;Antman;JAMA,2000

4. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: Sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS;de Araujo Goncalves;Eur Heart J,2005

5. Early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome;Katus;Eur Heart J,2017

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3