Using Mixed Methods Research to Optimize Healthy Lifestyle Intervention Adaptation for Web-Based Delivery: A Pragmatic Approach

Author:

Ivankova Nataliya V.1ORCID,Rogers Laura Q.2,Martin Michelle Y.3,Pisu Maria2,Pekmezi Dorophy4,Thompson Lieu1,Fontaine Kevin R.4,Schoenberger-Godwin Yu-Mei2,Hall Allyson1,Herbey Ivan I.5,Anderson Jami L.1ORCID,Oster Robert A.2,Kenzik Kelly6,Demark-Wahnefried Wendy7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

2. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

3. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

4. Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

5. Department of Surgery, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

6. Department of Surgery, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

Abstract

Intervention adaptation is a crucial step toward increasing intervention acceptability and translating evidence-based research into practice and broader use. This article describes a pragmatic approach to optimize intervention adaptation of AMPLIFY (AiM, Plan, and act on LIFestYles) web-based diet and exercise program for middle-aged and older cancer survivors by applying mixed methods research. A matrix with adaptation phases, elements, and methods is offered as an overarching framework to assist social and behavioral scientists as they pragmatically apply mixed methods to the process of intervention adaptation. This article contributes to mixed methods research by detailing an effective application and integration of mixed methods across the full spectrum of intervention adaptation (from formative assessment to beta-testing to process evaluation during efficacy testing).

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference33 articles.

1. Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control

2. Anderson J. L., Rogers L. Q., Demark- Wahnefried W., Martin M. L., Pisu M., Herbey I. I., Ivankova N. V. (2024, in review). Leveraging beta-testing “think aloud” interview data to inform the design of a qualitative component of a user-centered process evaluation.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. In This Issue: Special Issue Dedicated to Michael D. Fetters;Journal of Mixed Methods Research;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3