Recommendations for services for people living with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease: Results of a transparent expert consultation

Author:

Brighton Lisa Jane1ORCID,Tunnard India1ORCID,Farquhar Morag2ORCID,Booth Sara3,Miller Sophie1,Yi Deokhee1,Gao Wei1,Bajwah Sabrina1,Man William DC45,Reilly Charles C6,Ogden Margaret7,Bailey Sylvia7,Ewart Colleen7,Higginson Irene J1,Maddocks Matthew1

Affiliation:

1. Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK

2. School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

3. Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK

4. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

5. Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

6. Department of Physiotherapy, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

7. Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3