Horizontal or Vertical Support: Dilemmas for Patient Advice and Liaison Services in the NHS

Author:

Bentley Jane,Abbott Stephen,Meyer Julienne1,Lanceley Anne2

Affiliation:

1. City University, London

2. University College, London

Abstract

Every hospital, mental health, primary care and specialist trust in the English National Health Service (NHS) should have a Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS), to provide information and support to NHS patients with questions or concerns. PALS should also act as a catalyst for service improvement. This article draws on findings from a qualitative study of London PALS. In particular, it focuses on data generated during observation of meetings of PALS staff in each of London’. five Strategic Health Authority (SHA) sectors, over a period of nearly two years. It describes two types of support received by PALS staff horizontal peer support (the sector meetings themselves; other informal and local PALS contacts; the National PALS Development Group) and vertical hierarchical support (the trusts where PALS are based; Strategic Health Authorities; the Department of Health (DoH)). PALS staff appreciated horizontal support more unequivocally than vertical. Both types of support (horizontal and vertical) reflect parallel government agendas. The Government intends the NHS to become a much flatter hierarchy, and in non-hierarchical structures, staff are expected to look to peers for support. However, a centralised performance management regime also requires staff to look upwards for guidance. As ‘boundary spanners’ working between services and service users, PALS staff are at risk of isolation, and need both types of support to be effective

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The ethics of service work in a neoliberal healthcare context: doing embodied and “dirty” emotional labor;Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal;2021-11-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3