Sociology and Utopia

Author:

Levitas Ruth1

Affiliation:

1. Huddersfield Polytechnic

Abstract

The theme of this paper is that the content, form, location and social role of utopia vary with the material conditions in which people live. These variations have been obscured by definitions of utopia in terms of its function in catalysing social change, which has also produced the illusion that the contemporary Western world lacks utopias. By defining utopia with reference to its meaning to author and audience as an expression of their desires and aspirations, it is possible to trace a series of shifts in the English utopia, to relate these to one another and to the social context, and to show that the `absence' of contemporary utopias is simply another transformation of this kind. From being a spatially-located wish-fantasy, utopia moved through the function of social criticism to being a temporally-located catalyst of social change. These changes depended on perceptions of society-in-time as increasingly malleable and open to human control, culminating in the nineteenth century belief in progress. Utopia now appears to have reverted to the role of wish-fantasy as a result of a prevalent fatalism and a shift away from an evolutionary perspective, a change which, paradoxically, allows it to be more utopian by tying it less closely to reality. Utopia as a catalyst of social change depends on an optimism which is now absent.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference23 articles.

1. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1952, pp. 30-31, 120-130, 176-178;

2. G. W. Remmling , The Sociology of Karl Mannheim, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul , 1975, pp. 62, 142. Mannheim attempted to deal with the problem of universal relativism by introducing a dynamic concept of truth to correspond to the continuing flux of social reality. There seems to be some inconsistency between the pragmatic assessment of truth in terms of what `wins' and the claim that the socially unattached intellectual has greater access to the truth than others through his capacity to grasp and synthesize a variety of partial views. Our concern here is less with Mannheim's general criteria for truth than with the particular expression of this in relation to utopias.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Sozial-ökologische Utopien;Handbuch Umweltsoziologie;2024

2. Institutionalizing Experimental Places for Inclusive Social Innovation: From Utopias to Heterotopias;VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations;2023-06-12

3. Una società senza genere? Il potere trasformativo dell’utopia;Cambio. Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali;2023-03-27

4. Sozial-ökologische Utopien;Handbuch Umweltsoziologie;2023

5. The Sociology of Utopia, Modern Temporality and Black Visions of Liberation;Sociology;2022-10-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3