The Obligation to bring about Good in Social Work Research

Author:

Bogolub Ellen1

Affiliation:

1. Adelphi University, USA,

Abstract

Ethically, social work researchers should bring about good for research respondents. Referring to the work of other researchers who support beneficent research, this article describes an activity that can bring about such good: the identification and reporting of possible service gaps affecting research respondents. I identified this activity during a pilot qualitative study of children’s views regarding foster care. Specifically, interview transcript analysis highlighted comments suggesting unanticipated questions about services children received. Because of its characteristic methods of obtaining and analyzing data, qualitative research seems particularly likely to raise such unanticipated questions. Despite fear of jeopardizing future research possibilities, I raised the unanticipated questions about services at the agency. I aimed to enable the agency to address the questions, thereby helping children. In this case impact on agency services was slight. Nonetheless, the researcher’s obligation to report possible service gaps at agencies providing research samples was underscored.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health(social science)

Reference14 articles.

1. Beyond Individual Rights and Freedoms: Metaethics in Social Work Research

2. Editorial

3. Bloor, Michael ( 1997) ‘Addressing Social Problems through Qualitative Research’, in David Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, pp. 221-38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

4. Bloor, Michael and McKeganey, Neil ( 1989) ‘Ethnography addressing the Practitioner’ , in Jaber F. Gubrium and David Silverman (eds) The Politics of Field Research, pp. 197-212. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

5. Child Protective Services Investigations and the Transition to Foster Care: Children's Views

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3