Pre-filling of the extracorporeal circuit with autologous blood is safe, but not effective in optimizing biocompatibility in high-risk patients

Abstract

Objectives: Haemodilution resulting from crystalloid priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit represents a major risk factor for blood transfusions in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We designed this study to evaluate the effects of antegrade autologous priming (AAP) on reducing perioperative blood transfusion and markers of the inflammatory response in older patients (>75 years). Methods: Seventy-two patients undergoing first-time coronary bypass and/or aortic valve replacement were prospectively randomised to a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with or without AAP. AAP was performed by adding the patient’s own blood to the prime solution (mean 280ml). Perfusion and anaesthetic techniques were as usual. The haematocrit was maintained at a minimum of 21% during CPB. Patients were well matched for all preoperative variables, including established transfusion risk factors. The primary endpoint was the requirement of red cell transfusion. The surrogate endpoints were renal function, inflammatory response and ischaemic parameters. Blood samples were drawn pre- and intraoperatively and at intervals of 6 hours till POD 6. Results: Current analysis shows no differences in patients receiving homologous packed red cell transfusions. Also, markers of the inflammatory response (IL6, IL8), renal function (cystatin C, creatinine) and myocardial ischaemia (troponin T, CK-MB) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). Clinical outcomes were similar with respect to pulmonary, renal and hepatic function, length of ICU stay and hospital stay. Conclusion: These data suggest that antegrade autologous priming is a safe procedure, but an ineffective way for improving biocompatibility and reducing the need for blood transfusion in older patients.