Cardioprotective effects of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of comparative safety and efficacy

Author:

Shrestha Abhigan Babu1,Halder Anupam2,Rajak Kripa2,Jha Saroj Kumar3,Lamichhane Ramesh4,Oishee Arefin Naher1,Chowdary Nayanika Tummala5,Pokharel Pashupati3,Shrestha Sajina6,Adhikari Lukash7,Adhikari Bikash8,Rajak Aman7,Haider Khan Jalal9,Mainali NischalORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, M Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur, Bangladesh

2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Harrisburg, PA, USA

3. Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Jalalabad Ragib-Rabeya Medical College, Sylhet, Bangladesh

5. Gitam Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vishakhapatnam, India

6. KIST Medical College, Patan, Nepal

7. Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Patan, Nepal

8. Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu University, Kathmandu, Nepal

9. Tehsil Headquarter Hospital, Mianwali, Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are recommended for the treatment of heart failure due to their cardioprotective effects, despite primarily being used as antidiabetic medications. However, the comparative profile of two antidiabetic drugs, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor remains unclear. Study hypothesis: This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor drugs. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov using appropriate Medical Subject Headings terms from inception until February 23, 2023. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model for hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twelve studies were included after systematic screening, with a sample size of 745,688 for sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and 769,386 for dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The mean age in each group was 61.1 (8.52) and 61.28 (9.25) years, respectively. Upon pooling the included articles with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, the primary outcome of all-cause death demonstrated an hazard ratio of 0.64 (0.57, 0.70), I2: 65.54%, p < 0.001, and major adverse cardiovascular events yielded an hazard ratio of 0.76 (0.65, 0.86), I2: 87.83%, p < 0.001. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction with an hazard ratio of 0.84 (0.78, 0.90), I2: 47.64%, p < 0.001, stroke with an hazard ratio of 0.81 (0.75, 0.87), I2: 36.78%, p < 0.001, and hospitalization with an hazard ratio of 0.62 (0.53, 0.70), I2: 83.32%, p < 0.001. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, initiating treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors provides cardiovascular disease protection and may be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3