Don’t you forget about me: Independence of evaluations from the perspective of US evaluation clients—An exploratory study

Author:

Schmidli Fabienne Helen1ORCID,Pleger Lyn Ellen1,Hadorn Susanne2

Affiliation:

1. Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Switzerland

2. University of Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Policy evaluation literature has stressed the importance of independence of evaluations to guarantee objective evidence collection. The evaluator–client relationship is critical in this respect, since it contains inherent tensions due to the necessity for independent assessments alongside requirements for increased responsiveness to clients’ interests. Despite this distinct relationship, the client perspective has only recently received attention in research. This article presents findings from a survey among US evaluation clients and compares these to existing evidence from Switzerland. Unlike previous studies, we distinguish between constructive and destructive client influences. We show that professional experience and client familiarity with evaluation standards increase the likelihood of constructive influences aimed at improving evaluation results. Nevertheless, the findings indicate that dissatisfaction with an evaluation increases client’s attempts at influence that may be destructive. By discussing both motives behind influence and potential preventive measures, this article seeks to contribute to the increased social impact of policy evaluations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference43 articles.

1. American Evaluation Association (AEA) (2021a) About us. Available at: https://www.eval.org/About/About-AEA (accessed 23 March 2021).

2. American Evaluation Association (AEA) (2021b) Guiding principles. Available at: https://www.eval.org/About/Guiding-Principles (accessed 23 March 2021).

3. Australian Evaluation Society (AES) (2022) Ethical guidelines. Available at: https://www.aes.asn.au/ethical-guidelines (accessed 4 January 2022).

4. The manifestations of politics in evaluation: An exploratory study across the evaluation process

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3