A side-by-side comparison of two systems of sequencing coupled reactors for anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

Author:

Poggi-Varaldo Héctor M.1,Alzate-Gaviria Liliana M.2,Pérez-Hernández Antonino2,Nevarez-Morillón Virginia G.3,Rinderknecht-Seijas Noemí4

Affiliation:

1. CINVESTAV-IPN., Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Environmental Biotechnology R&D Group, P.O. Box 14-740, México DF, 07000, México,

2. Center for Research on Advanced Materials, S.C. (CIMAV). Chihuahua, Chih., México

3. Autonomous University of Chihuahua. Faculty of Chemistry, Chihuahua, Chih, México

4. ESIQIE-IPN, Division of Basic Sciences, Department of Chemical. Professional Unity Adolfo López Mateos, Bldg. 6, México, D.F.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to compare the performance of two laboratory-scale, mesophilic systems aiming at the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes (OFMSW). The first system consisted of two coupled reactors packed with OFMSW (PBR1.1-PBR1.2) and the second system consisted of an upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor (UASB) coupled to a packed reactor (UASB2.1-PBR2.2). For the start-up phase, both reactors PBR 1.1 and the UASB 2.1 (also called leading reactors) were inoculated with a mixture of non-anaerobic inocula and worked with leachate and effluent full recirculation, respectively. Once a full methanogenic regime was achieved in the leading reactors, their effluents were fed to the fresh-packed reactors PBR1.2 and PBR2.2, respectively. The leading PBR 1.1 reached its full methanogenic regime after 118 days ( Tm, time to achieve methanogenesis) whereas the other leading UASB 2.1 reactor reached its full methanogenesis regime after only 34 days. After coupling the leading reactors to the corresponding packed reactors, it was found that both coupled anaerobic systems showed similar performances regarding the degradation of the OFMSW. Removal efficiencies of volatile solids and cellulose and the methane pseudo-yield were 85.95%, 80.88% and 0.109 NL CH4 g-1 VSfed in the PBR-PBR system; and 88.75%, 82.61% and 0.115 NL CH4 g-1 VSfed in the UASB-PBR system [NL, normalized litre (273oK, 1 ata basis)]. Yet, the second system UASB-PBR system showed a faster overall start-up.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pollution,Environmental Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3