Self-Assessment of Research Skills and Barriers to Research Careers among Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows

Author:

Scott Meg K.1ORCID,Goodwin Andrew J.2,Nadig Nandita R.3,Harvey Jillian B.4,Kilb Edward F.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

2. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

4. Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recruitment and retention of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) trainees into academic research positions remain difficult. Factors influencing graduates, like salary and personal circumstances, remain unchangeable. However, some program-level factors, like research skill acquisition and mentorship, may be modifiable to encourage matriculation into academic research positions. OBJECTIVE We aim to identify proficiency in research-specific skills in PCCM trainees and barriers to careers as research-focused academic faculty. METHODS We surveyed PCCM fellows in a nationwide cross-sectional analysis including demographics, research intent, research skills self-assessment, and academic career barriers. The Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors approved and disseminated the survey. Data were collected and stored using the REDCap database. Descriptive statistics were used to assess survey items. RESULTS 612 fellows received the primary survey with 112 completing the survey for a response rate of 18.3%. A majority were male (56.2%) and training at university-based medical centers (89.2%). Early fellowship trainees (first-/second-year fellows) comprised 66.9% of respondents with 33.1% being late fellowship trainees (third-/fourth-year fellows). Most early trainees (63.2%) indicated they intended to incorporate research into their careers. A chi-square testing of independence was performed to examine the relationship between training level and perceived proficiency. Significant relationships in perceived proficiency were identified between early and late fellowship trainees with an absolute difference of 25.3% (manuscript writing), 18.7% (grant writing), 21.6% (study design), and 19.5% (quantitative/qualitative methodology). The most prevalent barriers were unfamiliarity with grant writing (59.5%) and research funding uncertainty (56.8%). CONCLUSION With an ongoing need for academic research faculty, this study identifies self-perceived gaps in research skills including grant writing, data analytics, and study conception and design. These skills map to fellow-identified barriers to careers in academics. Mentorship and innovative curriculum focusing on the development of key research skills may enhance academic research faculty recruitment.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Preparing Physician-Scientists for an Evolving Research Ecosystem

2. NHLBI. Research Training and Career Development: Human Resources for Research in the 21st Century. Report. Bethseda, MD: National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute; 1999:1-63. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/research/training/train-rev.pdf

3. ACGME Residents and Fellows by Sex and Specialty, 2019. 2020. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/interactive-data/acgme-residents-and-fellows-sex-and-specialty-2019

4. Horn L, Koehler E, Fau-Gilbert J, et al. Factors associated with the career choices of hematology and medical oncology fellows trained at academic institutions in the United States.

5. Nadig NR, Vanderbilt Aa Fau-Ford DW, Ford Dw Fau-Schnapp LM, Schnapp Lm Fau-Pastis NJ, Pastis NJ. Variability in structure of university pulmonary/critical care fellowships and retention of fellows in academic medicine.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3