Correlation Between Student Performances on Case-Based Constructed-Response Formative Assessment and Summative Assessment

Abstract

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the impact of formative assessment with case-based constructed-response question (CRQ) formats on student performance on the final summative assessment in the second-year periodontics course. METHODS Classroom quizzes with case-based CRQs were implemented as the formative assessment during the course. Each student received feedback on their responses from the course director. After all students (N = 128) took the second-year final examination, the Friedman test was conducted to compare student performances in each assessment over time. The multiple linear regression (MLR) model was used to evaluate the association between the second-year final examination score and plausible predictors—student gender, the second-year formative and midterm examination scores, and time spent on the final examination. RESULTS The mean % scores in the formative assessment (51) and midterm (84) examination were significantly lower than that of the final (87) examination ( P < .01). The number of students who failed the final (6) examination was significantly lower than the midterm (16) examination ( P = .03). The midterm ( P < .0001) and the formative assessment ( P = .0009) scores significantly affected the second-year final examination score while student gender ( P = .59) and time spending ( P = .83) showed no correlations. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of the study, student performance on case-based CRQs was correlated with student performance on the summative assessment.