Equitable Design and Use of Digital Surveillance Technologies During COVID-19: Norms and Concerns

Author:

Pratt Bridget12ORCID,Parker Michael3,Bull Susan34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Queensland Bioethics Centre, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia

2. School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

3. The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

4. Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

Given the unprecedented scale of digital surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic, designing and implementing digital technologies in ways that are equitable is critical now and in future epidemics and pandemics. Yet to date there has been very limited consideration about what is necessary to promote their equitable design and implementation. In this study, literature relating to the use of digital surveillance technologies during epidemics and pandemics was collected and thematically analyzed for ethical norms and concerns related to equity and social justice. Eleven norms are reported, including procedural fairness and inclusive approaches to design and implementation, designing to rectify or avoid exacerbating inequities, and fair access. Identified concerns relate to digital divides, stigma and discrimination, disparate risk of harm, and unfair design processes. We conclude by considering what dimensions of social justice the norms promote and whether identified concerns can be addressed by building the identified norms into technology design and implementation practice.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

University of Melbourne

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Education,Social Psychology

Reference63 articles.

1. Access Now (2020).Recommendations on Privacy and Data Protection in The Fight Against COVID-19. Retrieved from accessnow.org.

2. Ada Lovelace Institute (2020). Exit through the App Store? A rapid evidence review on the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from the COVID-19 crisis.

3. Albergotti R. (2020). European government officials call for tech companies to loosen grip on contact-tracing technology.The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/05/29/apple-google-contact-tracing/

4. Mass-surveillance technologies to fight coronavirus spread: the case of Israel

5. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3