The different worlds of Google – A comparison of search results on conspiracy theories in 12 countries

Author:

von Nordheim Gerret1ORCID,Bettels-Schwabbauer Tina2ORCID,Kleinen-von Königslöw Katharina1ORCID,Barczyszyn-Madziarz Paulina3ORCID,Budivska Halyna4,Di Salvo Philip5ORCID,Dingerkus Filip6,Guazina Liziane Soares7ORCID,Krobea Asante Kwaku8,Kuś Michał3ORCID,Lábová Sandra9ORCID,Matei Antonia10,Merkovity Norbert11ORCID,Paulino Fernando Oliveira7,Petrovszki-Oláh László11ORCID,Serwornoo Michael Yao Wodui12ORCID,Valente Jonas7,Wake Alexandra13ORCID,Zakinszky Toma Viktória14

Affiliation:

1. Universität Hamburg, Germany

2. TU Dortmund University, Germany

3. University of Wrocław, Poland

4. National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Ukraine

5. University of St. Gallen, Switzerland

6. Zurich University of Applied Sciences Winterthur, Switzerland

7. University of Brasília, Brazil

8. Media Foundation for West Africa, Ghana

9. Charles University, Czech Republic

10. University of Bucharest, Romania

11. University of Szeged, Hungary

12. Stetson University, USA

13. RMIT University, Australia

14. University of Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstract

Search engines play an important role in the spread of disinformation and conspiracy theories, accentuating the power of global platform companies such as Google to contribute to the digital (information) divide by providing search results of lesser quality in certain countries. We investigated this phenomenon by asking what kind of results users see when they search for information on eleven popular conspiracy theories (CTs) via Google. We analysed links from Google search results ( N = 1259) in 12 Western and non-Western countries and 10 languages. Overall, users are more likely to encounter neutral or debunking content when using Google to search for prominent CTs. However, for some CTs, strong country differences in the quality of search results emerge, showing clear correlations between categorical inequalities and unequal access to reliable information. In countries where journalists enjoy less freedom, people enjoy fewer democratic rights and are less able to rely on social elites, Google also provides less enlightening content on CTs than in developed and prosperous democracies. The countries thus disadvantaged are precisely those countries where there is a high propensity to believe in CTs according to comparative survey research. However, in countries where a global language is spoken, for example, English or Portuguese, there is no correlation between structural, country-specific factors and the quality of search results. In this sense, structurally disadvantaged countries seem to benefit from belonging to a larger language community.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de NivelSuperior—Brasil

Probral, Brazilian-German academiccooperation program CAPES/DAAD

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3