An integrative review on facilitators and barriers in delivering and managing injectable therapies in chronic conditions: A part of the ACNAP project ‘injectable medicines among patients with cardiovascular conditions’

Author:

Lambrinou Ekaterini1,Kyriakou Martha2,Lakatamitou Ioanna3,Angus Neil4,Khatib Rani567,Vellone Ercole8,Barrowcliff Abigail5,Hansen Tina Birgitte910,Lee Geraldine A11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus

2. Intensive Care Unit, Nicosia General Hospital, Cyprus

3. Intensive Care Unit, American Medical Center/American Heart Institute, Cyprus

4. Department of Nursing & Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, UK

5. Medicines Management & Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK

6. Cardiology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS, UK

7. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, UK

8. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

9. Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark

10. University of Southern Denmark, Department of Regional Health Research, Odense, Denmark

11. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, UK

Abstract

Introduction: Although preventive health and therapeutics have benefited from advances in drug development and device innovation, translating these evidence-based treatments into real-world practice remains challenging. Aim: The current integrative review aims to identify facilitators and barriers and perceptions in delivering and managing injectable therapies from patient perspectives. Methods: An integrative review was conducted in the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. Keywords were used “Injectable therapy”, “IV therapy”, “SC therapy”, “long term injectable therapies”, “self-administered injectable therapy”, “patients”, “caregivers”, “family”, “carers”, “facilitators”, “barriers”, “perspectives”, “needs”, “expectations”, “chronic disease”, “cardiovascular disease” linked with the words “OR” and “AND”. The search was limited from January 2000 to July 2019. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Results: Twenty studies were identified from the literature search. Studies followed qualitative, quantitative methodology and mixed methods. Facilitators included: health improvement, prevention of disease complications, taking control of their disease, effectiveness of the medication and convenience in management. Barriers included: fear of needles, insulin will cause harm, poor perception of the benefits of injectable therapies on their quality of life, inconvenience in self-management, social stigma, impact on daily living, financial barriers, lack of education. Perceptions included: ‘treatment of last resort’, ‘life becomes less flexible’, ‘injectables were punishment/restriction’, ‘personal failure of self-management’. Conclusion: Evidence shows how to create effective communication and shared decision-making relationships to provide best possible care to patients who need injectable therapy and support for self-management. Future research might help guide response to the fears and barriers of the patients using patients’ perspectives.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Medical–Surgical Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Improvement in achievement of lipid targets in France: comparison of data from coronary patients in the DYSIS and DYSIS II studies;Ferrières;Int J Cardiol,2016

2. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications;Zheng;Nat Rev Endocrinol,2018

3. Obesity and cognitive dysfunction in heart failure: the role of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and physical fitness;Alosco;Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs,2015

4. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th ed.Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2017. 1–150 pp. http://www.diabetesatlas.org (2017; accessed 17 June 2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3