Affiliation:
1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA,
Abstract
In this article I respond to the analyses of Educating the `Right'Way and The State and the Politics of Knowledge that were given by Stephen Ball, Russell Fox and Antonio Novoa. I situate the development of the kinds of argument that these books make, in the larger corpus of my work and in the growth of neoliberal, neoconservative, authoritarian populist religious movements, and the new managerial emphases that have become so powerful internationally in education. I then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the thoughtful points made by Ball, Fox and Novoa.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Community and contestation: a Gramscian case study of teacher resistance;Journal of Curriculum Studies;2019-03-08
2. Social Movement Knowledge and Anthropology of Education;Anthropology & Education Quarterly;2019-02-17
3. Social Movements and Educational Research: Toward a United Field of Scholarship;Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education;2018-03
4. Addressing Standardized Testing Through a Novel Assessment Model;Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age;2016
5. Counterpublics, crisis and critique;Education Policy and Contemporary Theory;2015-06-12