Sensitivity of the conditional period selection in the structural response using the CMS as target spectrum

Author:

Arteta Carlos A1ORCID,Torregroza Andrés1,Gaspar Daniel2,Abrahamson Norman3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia

2. Degenkolb Engineers, Oakland, CA, USA

3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

Abstract

A framework is presented for assessing the sensitivity of typical engineering demand parameters (EDP) to the conditional period selection when using conditional mean spectra (CMS) as targets for ground-motion selection in a performance-based seismic evaluation. The framework consists of computing a suite of CMS targets anchored at conditioning periods within a period range of interest to discretize the demand at a given hazard level, as represented by a uniform hazard spectrum (UHS). Ground motions are selected and scaled for the CMS suite and the associated UHS. The envelope of the median responses from the CMS suite is compared with the median response from the UHS. The framework is instrumental in identifying the conditioning period ( T*) range for estimating CMS to capture the maximum median responses at the hazard level of interest. It also helps to characterize the relative difference in responses between using CMS targets and a UHS. The implementation of the methodology is illustrated by evaluating response quantities such as displacement-, acceleration, and force-based EDPs of four reinforced concrete moment frame structures of different heights under three levels of increasing hazard. Results confirm that the conditioning period used for ground-motion selection has a significant impact on the seismic response of displacement-based EDPs, and the sensitivity of the response varies with building height. For other EDPs, like maximum base shear and story acceleration, the results vary. Based on a limited-size ground motion set typically used in practice, the results indicate that UHS-targeted ground motions do not necessarily yield greater demand in comparison with using the CMS for estimating peak story drifts. For maximum floor accelerations, however, the CMS did produce smaller responses.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3